top of page
Search

On Serialization

  • Writer: Adam Cox
    Adam Cox
  • Jun 2
  • 2 min read

Everyone interested in art and who follows the work of various artists is well aware that art is often produced as part of a series. As a result, artists create a recognizable style, producing a sufficient group of works to fill a gallery. From a commercial perspective, this seems to make a lot of sense. When galleries give artists opportunities to exhibit, they want to ensure a return on that investment by reinforcing elements of a recognizable style to which collectors might be repeatedly drawn. In this sense, is there an argument that serialization is a way of transforming art into a commodity that is ultimately anti-art? I realize this question pokes at the distinction between art as a radical expression of authenticity and personal expression vs. something that pivots around design and a general sense of "artsyness. "


I don't want to be misunderstood here. I can think of many artists who have created bodies of work with common elements that are rich in meaning. I am repeatedly knocked out by Mondrian's late work, and am also riveted by much of what Anselm Kiefer has done. Still, I wonder if serialization is a trap for many of us seeking recognition and a platform for sales.


My personal belief is that art is a form of emancipation from a sphere of human interaction preoccupied with commerce. I am certainly not against artists selling their work, or galleries making a profit from exhibitions. However, there is some merit in thinking about the order of things; specifically, how priorities are organized. Serialization provides a degree of order on which commerce thrives, but in the spaces between those serialized works (psychological and emotional), is a realm of human experience that may be disruptive, but also more personal - more central to what motivates art's creation. There are many times when I encounter gallery shows where there is obvious talent, but where I nonetheless want to ask "what do you really feel?" As much as I appreciate artistic confidence and brilliance, I also deeply appreciate signs of struggle, indications an artist has wrestled with inner tension, or some type of disjunction between self and the outer world.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
First Thoughts

The great paradigm of art history by which art is studied and discussed is that of form and content. So that seems like a good working...

 
 
 

Comments


© 2024    Adam Cox,           A damCoxArt.com

bottom of page